Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 12 '20 at 03:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 157
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 700
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 158
Parallax 150
119% 151 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 141
Splatting 117
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 795 815 815 804 799 824 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 997
Write 319
Mixed 500
SusWrite 809
146% 656 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 34.4
116% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 253
189% 251 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 137%
Great: 214%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
939GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 170
Write 1
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 0.5
31% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 41.2
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback