Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '17 at 12:36
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 258
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 805
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.72
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 125
Parallax 124
100% 124 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 111
Splatting 103
87% 106 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
65GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 411
Mixed 424
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 34.6
153% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 142
157% 267 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,038
Write 670
Mixed 909
263% 1,206 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 51.1
239% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 166
184% 320 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 212%
Great: 243%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 49
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 28.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 45.7
88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 137%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback