Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 19:06
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 701
69% 566 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 86.9
57% 75.4 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 58.7
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
77GB free
Firmware: UE30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 30 47 50 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.6% Poor
Read 101
Write 69.8
Mixed 79
SusWrite 44.6
16% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 15.6
55% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 13.9
11% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 53%
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 30 38 26 50 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 86%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
781GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 107 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 130
Write 106
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 112
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
328GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 100 93 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 55.9
Write 5.7
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 95.2
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
496GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 90 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 90
Write 88.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 94.2
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 55%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 125 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 158
Write 132
Mixed 117
SusWrite 134
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 85%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
30GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 17
Mixed 18
SusWrite 15.9
24% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4
257% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 27.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback