Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50% Average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 33.6 2-Core 72.7 43% 62.6 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 98.9 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 105A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 2.78 2% 3.36 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 6.43 4% 4.34 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B256 256GB 8,101 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: G881201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 192 191 165 149 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 406 Write 322 Mixed 282 SusWrite 176 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 25.7 78% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 126 101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.3% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	70x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	17x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	87x

SSD
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	37x
RBU-SNS8152S3256GF 256GBKingstonBench 57%, 334 samples	10x
CV1-8B512 512GBLiteonBench 86%, 2,348 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16