HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 01:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 267
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 816
81% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.05
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 140
Parallax 152
124% 148 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 127
Splatting 93.4
101% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 283 227 181 163 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 442
Mixed 291
SusWrite 225
96% 436 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 36.4
127% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 395
295% 397 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
204GB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 85 91 98 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 166
Write 146
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 95.2
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 100 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 99.7
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback