Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 95.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 508
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 8406) 2GB
CLim: 692 MHz, MLim: 1251 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 25.5
30% 27.2 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.6
18% 23.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 243 162 155 142 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70% Very good
Read 260
Write 249
Mixed 238
SusWrite 181
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 38.9
127% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
255GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 93 93 93 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 80.8
Write 88.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 95.5
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
572GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 98 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 115
Write 103
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 96.4
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback