Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y9WKM
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 12:36
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 118
59% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 173
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0535) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 3.19
4% 4.66 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.78
5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 2.5 7MM 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 423 428 420 420 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 423
Write 418
Mixed 343
SusWrite 396
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 27.7
91% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 232
190% 273 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.1% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback