Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 132
57% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 239
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 49.7
32% 41.6 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 39.9
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 2.1 2.1 28 151 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 355
Write 238
Mixed 170
SusWrite 85.6
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 14.6
55% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 26.3
DQ Mixed 15.1
14% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
80GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 78 79 76 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 94.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 78
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. M378B5773CH0-CH9 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback