bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BA
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 07:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 187
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 347
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.04 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 419
Mixed 68.3
69% 313 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 132
138% 225 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
4GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 3.9 5.8 6.4 7.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 15.2
Mixed 18
SusWrite 6.5
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
800GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 34.2
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.3
149% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67F1600G 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback