HP 810-209

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 810-209  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory3.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 04:57
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 231
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 577
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 441.06
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 29.5
18% 25.2 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 21.6
22% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM10H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 47 49 44 42 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 320
Write 132
Mixed 144
SusWrite 50.1
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 25.3
107% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 90.3
101% 181 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
37GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 71 105 70 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 42.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 71.3
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Portable 2TB
772GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 93 98 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 77
Write 106
Mixed 69
SusWrite 94.5
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
51GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 168 120 178 176 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 68.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 152
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0604
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.2
Write 61
Mixed 77
48% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698651-154-KEF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-209 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-209

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback