Lenovo 10M9A015TW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10M9A015TW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3102
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 02:49
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 222
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 441
55% 421 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 7
6% 7.88 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk1 86GB
24GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 40 44 16 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 100
Write 66.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 23.6
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MH78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback