Gateway DX4370G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGateway DX4370G  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DX4370G
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 18:22
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 78.4
35% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 151
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Acer(1025 061D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 2.84
3% 3.65 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 130 124 138 139 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 178
Write 159
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 135
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
263GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 167
Write 141
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 100
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 112%
Corsair Survivor 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 1a0a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 83.6
Mixed 36.1
96% 88 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564404EP0200 Kingston KP223C-ELD HU554304EP0200 Kingston KP223C-ELD 10GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback