Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 39.3 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 97.1 35% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 191 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 5.7 3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 128GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 71 70 71 70 71 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 384 Write 291 Mixed 271 SusWrite 98.4 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 30.2 119% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 191 167% 247 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.2% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16