Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-EINM10CB (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-EINM10CB
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 39.3 1-Core 7.6 2-Core 15.4 17% 20.8 Pts	4-Core 25.8 8-Core 25.8 3% 25.8 Pts	64-Core 25.9 2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 69 71 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 61.2 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 71.5 40% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 51%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 28GB free Firmware: 11.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 39 44 46 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 31.2 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 43.7 25% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GB 403 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16