Microelectronics G225

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G225  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360 Pro4
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190422
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 19:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 737
77% 616 Pts
64-Core 738
46% 738 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.7% Very good
Lighting 90.2
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 78.2
74% 81.7 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 68.6
65% 81.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 149 130 160 140 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 488
Write 460
Mixed 302
SusWrite 156
78% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 34
112% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 281
229% 326 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 24.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 26.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G225 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Microelectronics G225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback