Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T3500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09KPNV
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3530-$287
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 77
2-Core 148
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 293
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 6.22
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 8.07
Splatting 8.43
7% 8.75 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 62 67 54 68 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 238
Write 231
Mixed 207
SusWrite 72.8
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 110
99% 151 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 83%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 95
Write 84.1
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 89.5
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback