HP 550-171ns

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 550-171ns (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B52
Memory	7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '20 at 15:45
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 1,794 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 120 48% 81.4 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 184 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Device(1B0A 90F3) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 38.3 26% 33 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 27.9 Splatting 33.7 24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB 2,125 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 150 122 146 107 126 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 374 Write 225 Mixed 223 SusWrite 139 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 33.3 112% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 183 150% 213 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 547GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 35 50 36 78 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 51 Write 98.5 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 48.6 52% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.8 4.8 5.4 4.8 5.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 6.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.8 6% 4.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Mixed 0 34% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 26 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 27.7 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 9GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.5 2.9 2.4 3 2 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Read 27 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 2.4 6% 7.95 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 4,871 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 550-171ns

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)