Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 12:18
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 193
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 706
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 114
Parallax 232
108% 159 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 137
Splatting 160
115% 137 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8PeGN 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 623 578 542 522 508 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1342
Write 883
Mixed 688
SusWrite 580
194% 873 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.6
188% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 602
488% 694 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 180%
Great: 210%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
230GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2388 196 482 293 373 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,386
Write 2,440
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 684
338% 1495 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 69.5
225% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 942
685% 892 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 206%
Great: 368%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
68GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 112 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 112
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
417GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 133 130 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 66.5
Write 73.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 132
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 88%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
4GB free, PID 8989
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.53% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.6
8% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 34.9
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 32.9
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $968
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback