Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 125 2-Core 242 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 744 72% 593 Pts	64-Core 1,034 64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 110 Parallax 103 86% 106 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 95.6 Splatting 92.7 89% 112 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 94%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 509GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1580 1595 1482 1291 1363 1370 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 1,947 Write 1,686 Mixed 1,400 SusWrite 1447 364% 1,620 MB/s	4K Read 55.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 60.6 220% 75.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,047 DQ Write 876 DQ Mixed 955 717% 959 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	78% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 22.2 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 25.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,066x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,449x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	598x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	818x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,761x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16