Razer Blade

Performance Results

Gaming 80%
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 232
87% 149 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 564
63% 483 Pts
64-Core 742
50% 742 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 133
Parallax 119
95% 123 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 101
Splatting 96
88% 116 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 102%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D512 512GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 149 163 168 155 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 109
Mixed 144
SusWrite 154
96% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 44.5
158% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1242
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 83.5
208% 472 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 144%
Great: 254%
Samsung Portable SSD X5 2TB
644GB free
Firmware: 1P3QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 71 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 1,219
Write 139
Mixed 240
SusWrite 93.6
90% 423 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.5
74% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 24.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $199Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback