PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190213 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '20 at 18:20 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
44.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 347 354 376 354 295 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Verbatim MICRO PLUS 8GB
3GB free, PID 0244
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 4.1 MB/s
|
5.25%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 38x |
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 27x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 32x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $30 |