Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 31.4 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 27.9 18% 26.9 Pts	4-Core 32.9 8-Core 34 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 27%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: GR2OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 72 54 64 40 81 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 93.5 Write 51.6 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 60.3 44% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 3.9 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.2 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 247 16% 247 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	164x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	27x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	23x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	160x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	44x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	26x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	36x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	18x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16