Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 338 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 332 20% 332 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 848E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2 2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240 240GB 1,127 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2019 SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 403 384 382 379 378 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 471 Write 372 Mixed 315 SusWrite 391 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 16.6 92% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 92.2 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 22.6 72% 149 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16