TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 22:07
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 726
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 86.7%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 C580)
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 68
Parallax 85.8
54% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 69
Splatting 56
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 53.1%
 Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mercury Electra 6G SSD 1TB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 5.6 3.2 7.6 147 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 334
Write 388
Mixed 395
SusWrite 124
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 24.2
126% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 33.9
73% 145 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 67.2%
 Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (87th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 40.3
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 116%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel  $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples204x
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples171x
Core i7-6900KIntel  $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples102x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples178x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples91x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples64x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples36x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples14x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback