Lenovo 80NY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80NY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Allsparks 5B
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 22:08
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 38
1-Core 63
2-Core 111
40% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 187
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7
Legend(17AA 3807) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 13.2
8% 11 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 9.63
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
778GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 75 84 79 82 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 84
Write 83.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 81.3
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0xBA01 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80NY Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback