Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '17 at 04:02
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$99 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 77.3 34% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 366 44% 336 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.7% Average	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 51.6 Parallax 107 30% 64.9 fps	MRender 98 Gravity 103 Splatting 102 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
F200 240GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3114 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1712 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (AA) Unknown 100 100 211 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5570689 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (DA) Unknown 100 100 28 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7916	55.5% Above average	Read 463 Write 210 Mixed 361 76% 345 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 7.51 66% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 21.2 45% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 891GB free Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 147 147 25788088558 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4537 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3890 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2033 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4537 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4537 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 223339020319 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 137 Mixed 156 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.22 101% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 304GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 140347304 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5064 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 113033895 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5697 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2945 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 521404447 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 150 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 49466 (C2) HDA temperature 31 52 38654705695 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -128612795675019 (F1) Unknown 100 253 21435448307 (F2) Unknown 100 253 30186258032	71% Very good	Read 111 Write 137 Mixed 132 96% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 9.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16