Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 489 54% 425 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 18.6 12% 15.4 fps	MRender 17.7 Gravity 17.1 Splatting 16 14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Revoluti ONS500_256OEM 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: S091 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 18 18 19 20 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.7% Poor	Read 477 Write 368 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 50.9 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 0.4 22% 8.07 MB/s	DQ Read 57.7 DQ Write 17.7 DQ Mixed 0.5 10% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 61%
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 73GB free Firmware: RVT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 238 239 242 242 241 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.4% Very good	Read 255 Write 240 Mixed 240 SusWrite 240 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 39 125% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 42.1 72% 140 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 122%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 194GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 102 102 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 100 Write 72.5 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 101 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GB 1,119 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.3% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.8 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	298x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	26x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	12x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100