Dell Latitude E4200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E4200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X253R
Memory2.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 13:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo U9600
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 21
2-Core 32.7
28% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 35.8
5% 35.2 Pts
64-Core 38.5
2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Dell(1028 0277) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.31 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.23
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.27%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-CS3 TM 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 91 130 135 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 188
Write 61.8
Mixed 83
SusWrite 120
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.2
33% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback