MSI MS-17F2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 9SC
MotherboardMSI MS-17F2  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 691
76% 599 Pts
64-Core 873
54% 873 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1283) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 56.1
56% 61.8 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 50.3
41% 49.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 924 647 644 649 649 642 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2104
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,425
SusWrite 692
342% 1,528 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 82.4
273% 92.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 1,310
987% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 270%
Great: 296%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
886GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 490 490 492 492 492 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Sobetter Ext 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 129 130 105 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Linux File-CD Gadget 4GB
3GB free, PID 0904
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 4.8 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.64% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 4.1
11% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905744-024.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 27.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F2 Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback