HP 1000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 1000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 12:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 60
37% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 96.6
8-Core 103
13% 99.6 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 2.26
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC7110D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 279 278 274 286 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 400
Write 298
Mixed 229
SusWrite 283
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 22.5
81% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 177
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 63.8
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 55.8
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905417-041.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 1000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback