Asus A8N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A8N-E  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 4000+
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 34.3
33% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 34.8
8-Core 33.3
5% 34 Pts
64-Core 34.5
2% 34.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 105 105 104 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.1% Average
Read 128
Write 106
Mixed 111
SusWrite 105
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 63.2
DQ Mixed 41.2
33% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB
106GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 24.3
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 66
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%
Maxtor 6L200P0 204GB
104GB free
Firmware: BAH41E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 52.8
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 53.2
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
145% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A8N-E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A8N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback