Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 01:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 161
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 281
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 7.75
5% 8.77 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 14
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 5.8 19 21 82 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 462
Write 367
Mixed 225
SusWrite 76.1
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 15.9
62% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 29
40% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
699GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 117 118 116 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 145
Write 95.5
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 116
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback