ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 86C9
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 23:56
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 125 2-Core 174 76% 127 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 326 44% 325 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 86C9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 7.13 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 6.81 6% 7.38 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 13.7 8% 9.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB 8,196 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 608 538 582 580 561 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 707 Write 551 Mixed 610 SusWrite 579 138% 612 MB/s	4K Read 48.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 64.6 217% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 656 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 411 325% 461 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 152%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 720GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 91GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 359 180 110 106 109 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.2% Above average	Read 306 Write 313 Mixed 290 SusWrite 204 63% 278 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 23.4 71% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 144 106% 139 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 58%
SDXC Card 64GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 9GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 19.5 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 20.6 30% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.9 123% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.1 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	447x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	267x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	260x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	707x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	266x
Iris Plus G4IntelBench 6%, 12,263 samples	39x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	176x
MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GBCrucialBench 139%, 5,621 samples	106x
hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GBSKBench 163%, 5,553 samples	87x

RAM
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 4,752 samples	167x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	72x
AO1P26KC8T1-BXPS 1x8GBAdataBench 40%, 2,085 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback