Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 11:11
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	90%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 42.6 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 174 55% 104 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 580 55% 456 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.23 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.21 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.28 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 96 102 102 120 85 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 16.7 Write 69 Mixed 184 SusWrite 104 22% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 8.4 36% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 86.6 DQ Mixed 0.2 34% 85 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 76%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 156GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 30 14 28 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 28 Write 24.7 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 22.5 34% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.M16FH 1x16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	26x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	7x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $403

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16