Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '20 at 11:03
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 116 2-Core 229 83% 145 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 594 63% 501 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Asus(1043 83F6) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 37.2 Parallax 49.4 33% 42.3 fps	MRender 49.9 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 34.5 35% 43.9 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$45 164 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 507ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 90 90 86 92 MB/s Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.3% Good	Read 190 Write 109 Mixed 161 SusWrite 89.6 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 34.5 145% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 86 73% 106 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 10GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 7.8 9.8 8.1 10 9.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 38 Write 5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 8.1 20% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.6 236% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL11 4GB 2x4GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.4% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	495x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	160x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	55x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	32x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	28x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $731

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16