HPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 10:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 107
43% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 311
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZ-5EA1000-0D3 100GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM17D3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 110 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 208
Write 112
Mixed 148
SusWrite 110
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 12.6
57% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 77.9
66% 100 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 40%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
483GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 122 122 122 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 117
Mixed 63
SusWrite 121
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HPE 840755-091 840755-091 809082-091 32GB
2666, 2666, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 27.2
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML110 Gen10 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant ML110 Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback