Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 02:02
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 804
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 68.6
58% 69.7 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 70
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 42
32% 37.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39
Splatting 36.9
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB-$77
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 307 298 333 386 244 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 423
Write 411
Mixed 290
SusWrite 315
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 35.8
131% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 168
140% 210 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 121%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
524GB free
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 381 333 431 429 283 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 273
Write 106
Mixed 92
SusWrite 380
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 24.6
19% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 102%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
316GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 30 35 35 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 34.7
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 32.9
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 28.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback