Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LE PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 23:57
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$350
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
78% 131 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 523
57% 440 Pts
64-Core 518
35% 518 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 314
Reflection 243
Parallax 295
83% 284 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 273
Splatting 180
77% 226 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 330 316 290 268 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 462
Write 408
Mixed 324
SusWrite 289
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 26.9
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 177
174% 279 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$84
175GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 107 112 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 112
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
139% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 77%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$130
397GB free
Firmware: JA2OA700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 89 103 92 103 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 96.4
54% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$84
276GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 99 96 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 93
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 97.2
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 77%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$43
284GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 95 92 93 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
43% Average
Read 56.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 93.4
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 67%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55
372GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 72.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 74.9
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LE PLUS Builds (Compare 2,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS - $412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback