Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 48.8 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 33.2 24% 33.5 Pts	4-Core 34.9 8-Core 34.1 5% 34.5 Pts	64-Core 25.8 2% 25.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.19 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.04 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 109 85 14 55 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.9% Poor	Read 165 Write 91 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 78.9 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 8 29% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 42.8 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 75.4 51% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 119GB free Firmware: JP2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 85 84 85 85 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 90.7 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 84 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8N6PHSFG Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16