Apple iMac7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple iMac7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42386C8
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 17:29
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7700-$100
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 53.6
36% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 54.3
8-Core 53.9
7% 54.1 Pts
64-Core 54.6
3% 54.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
Apple(106B 0083) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 1
2% 2.59 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 4.65
2% 2.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH1ZABHA 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 188 195 200 200 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 197
Write 203
Mixed 175
SusWrite 189
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 27.2
85% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 71.2
DQ Mixed 35.9
31% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac7,1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback