| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS. (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 01 '20 at 13:57 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.7%
Good
|
65% 108 Pts
|
28% 206 Pts
|
13% 207 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
60% 73.2 fps
|
34% 47.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 9.9 8.6 7.5 7 8 MB/s
|
26.6%
Poor
|
22% 30.4 MB/s
|
107% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
External USB3.0 1TB
64GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 28 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
37% 27.2 MB/s
|
90% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
48.9%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 11x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 11x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $286 |