Gigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '17 at 05:27
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 71.1
44% 63 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 142
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.723.0.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 413
Write 408
Mixed 423
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 11.5
102% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 19.3
68% 149 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-880GMA-UD2H Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GMA-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback