Gigabyte GA-P55-UD6

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-UD6 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 19:08
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 147 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 436 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 38.2 36% 38 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 36.4 31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct120bx3 0 120GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: M2CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 187 191 192 108 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 364 Write 191 Mixed 224 SusWrite 172 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 32.6 106% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 89.7 73% 105 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 188GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 73 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 75.8 Write 71.5 Mixed 42.1 SusWrite 72.1 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 779GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 82 82 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 103 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 80.8 61% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 12 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-UD6 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD6

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	9x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
Force 120GBCorsairBench 44%, 1,958 samples	4x
AS340 480GBApacerBench 73%, 5,317 samples	2x
GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GBGigabyteBench 71%, 3,461 samples	2x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	8x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $619

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16