TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 16:21
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 186
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 280
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 71.2%
 Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 51.4
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 36.4
37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 35.1%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A-00JH 240GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 67 23 42 14 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 419
Write 327
Mixed 208
SusWrite 59.5
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 8.2
48% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 41.6
45% 76 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 38.5%
 Great: 53%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
73GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 135 144 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 135
Mixed 34
SusWrite 136
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 82.3%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 34.3%
 Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples1,195x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples506x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples498x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples568x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples482x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples413x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples350x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples171x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples151x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples92x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples90x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback