Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 574
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1387 MHz, MLim: 1995 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 77.6
48% 68.6 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 57.5
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 194 191 194 196 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 345
Write 199
Mixed 218
SusWrite 194
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 20.3
76% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 119
114% 181 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
201GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 70.1
Write 73.2
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 85.9
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
95GB free
Firmware: GG2OACA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 42 48 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 12.9
Write 47.3
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 45.7
23% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback