Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 08:56
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 159
2-Core 309
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,116
100% 845 Pts
64-Core 2,191
136% 2,191 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Sapphire(1DA2 E423) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 107
62% 79.4 fps
MRender 54.2
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 69.9
55% 66.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 500GB 500GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 384 394 403 406 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 416
Mixed 394
SusWrite 394
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 67.6
74% 124 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
931GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 823 825 3305 3956 3984 3985 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,003
Write 3,631
Mixed 2,219
SusWrite 2813
606% 2,666 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 87.3
294% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 638
641% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 399%
Great: 491%
Verbatim Mobile Drive 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 93 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 98
Mixed 33
SusWrite 94.3
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 80%
Verbatim Mobile Drive SD 16GB
15GB free, PID 9424
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 91.2
Write 28.9
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 24.7
59% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.7
173% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 26%
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB
30GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.4 6.2 5.8 5.6 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 36
Write 3.3
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 6.2
16% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.8
101% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 46
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 41
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback