Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120215
Uptime	13.5 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 05:10
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$191 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 75 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 126 55% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 226 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 29.9 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 28.6 24% 31.1 fps	MRender 32.5 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 33.6 27% 33 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 283 264 265 266 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 288 Write 284 Mixed 236 SusWrite 264 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 23.8 75% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 40.3 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 55 46% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 124 125 123 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 121 Write 116 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 123 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.6% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	188x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16