Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 30 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 75.5 1-Core 155 2-Core 301 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 593 8-Core 1,005 97% 799 Pts	64-Core 1,454 90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Lighting 77.3 Reflection 77.4 Parallax 67.3 63% 74 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 73.5 59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 871GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 1770 1795 1113 952 1393 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 1,870 Write 1,865 Mixed 1,406 SusWrite 1,467 372% 1,652 MB/s	4K Read 65.1 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 90.8 308% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1052 DQ Write 1,169 DQ Mixed 434 514% 885 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 311%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 63GB free Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 342 297 297 291 273 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 444 Mixed 323 SusWrite 318 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 42.8 149% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 131 119% 181 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 366GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 304 308 309 307 306 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 453 Mixed 450 SusWrite 330 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 95.6 4K Mixed 55.8 185% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 430GB free Firmware: JKAOA28A SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 75 74 75 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 115 Write 117 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 74 66% 90.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 637GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 77.2 Write 72.5 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 67.4 51% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 847GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 93 93 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 122 Write 117 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 92 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 350GB free Firmware: JKAOA20N SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 75 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 76.2 Write 82.5 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 73.8 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 54,651 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.1% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 30 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 29.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	398x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	381x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	151x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	144x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	121x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	67x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $1,305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16