Asus N551JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus N551JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551JX
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 21:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 182
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 436
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 177D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 11.9
6% 11.8 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 4.73
Splatting 14.8
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 453 431 440 421 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 459
Mixed 337
SusWrite 436
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 33.2
117% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 175
172% 271 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 16.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551JX Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback