| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X10DRi (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X10DRi |
| Memory | 61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191122 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 30 '20 at 18:27 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
75.7%
Very good
|
72% 126 Pts
|
66% 560 Pts
|
110% 1,782 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
122%
Outstanding
|
134% 175 fps
|
116% 144 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 313 316 315 315 315 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
80% 354 MB/s
|
115% 38.6 MB/s
|
258% 346 MB/s
|
|
Seagate USB 1TB
269GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
49% 36.2 MB/s
|
88% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.3%
Good
|
71% 24.8 GB/s
|
46% 15.9 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X10DRi Builds (Compare 49 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X10DRi
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v31stBench 68%, 414 samples | 7x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v31stBench 62%, 755 samples | 6x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v31stBench 48%, 369 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 10x |
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $499 |